
Home | Organization | Members | News
and Info. | Publications | Products | Interesting
Links | library
| Secure | Contact
Us
|
Safety testing of Biotechnology Products derived
from Cell Lines of Human and Animal
Origin
|
|
It
was in 1982 that the World Health Organisation
(WHO) introduced safety testing guidelines for the
use of continuous cell lines employed as substrates
for the production of inactivated viral vaccines.
Since then, progress in the biomedical sciences and
the exploitation of biotechnology has led to the
development of new biological medicinal products at
an unprecedented rate. Today's philosophy of the
WHO, The Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (CBER) at the US Food & Drug
Administration (FDA), and the Japanese Ministry of
Health for the regulation of biotechnology
products, is a case by case approach based on risk-
benefit assessments, sound scientific principles
and the experience with these products in the last
two decades. The safety testing guidelines issued
by all these regulatory agencies and the major
progress made recently by the International
Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) are the basis for
ensuring the safety of new biological
entities.
|
Major concern: viral contamination
|
|
The
major concern when using mammalian cell lines for
production of a biotechnology product, is the risk
of viral contamination. Such contamination could
have serious clinical consequences and can arise
from the contamination of the cell substrate or by
the introduction of adventitious viruses during
production.
To date however, biotechnology products derived
from cell lines have not been implicated in the
transmission of viruses. To ensure the continued
safety of these products, the adoption of a sound
virus testing program is essential. The strategy
that has evolved since 1982 consists of three
complimentary approaches:
- selecting
and testing cell lines and raw materials
(including cell culture media and animal derived
raw materials), for the absence of undesirable
viruses which may be infectious and/or
pathogenic for humans;
- assessing
the capacity of the manufacturing process to
inactivate or remove infectious
viruses;
- testing
the product at appropriate stages during
production for the absence of contaminating
infectious viruses.
Confidence
that infectious virus is absent from the final
purified product cannot, in most instances, be
derived solely from direct testing due to the
inherent limitations of viral assays, that is, the
ability to detect low levels of viral contamination
depends for statistical reasons on the size of the
sample being tested.
Testing the capacity of the purification scheme to
remove or inactivate known or unknown viruses is
therefore a critical element in the overall safety
testing strategy.
|
Potential
sources of viral contamination
|
|
1.
Contamination of the Cell Substrate. Viruses could
be introduced into the cell substrate from several
sources, including derivation from infected animals
(e.g. rodent viruses in murine hybridomas and
chinese hamster cells) and the use of contaminated
cell culture reagents, such as bovine viruses from
animal sera or porcine viruses from trypsin.
Endegenous viruses, such as retroviruses, pose a
particular problem in assessing the safety of cell
substrates, as they may be transmitted in the germ
line, since the viral genome persists within the
cell. These endegenous retroviruses may be
expressed without deleterious effects on the cells,
and could be infectious to human cells.
2. Adventitious viruses introduced during the
manufacturing process. The likely sources of
contamination include the use of contaminated cell
culture media, a breakdown in GMP allowing operator
or other external contamination, the use of a
contaminated excipient during formulation or other
reagents used in the process, such as a monoclonal
antibody affinity chromatography column.
The importance of the sourcing and the
qualification of all raw materials used in the
manufacturing process has become a key area for the
biopharmaceutical industry, not just to exclude
viral contamination, but also to address the
concerns of other contaminants such as
transmissable spongiform encephalopathy agents,
such as BSE. Cell culture media which exclude all
animal components are now widely used in the
industry to reduce the potential contamination
problems.
|
Purified
Bulk
|
|
The
testing of the purified bulk will vary, depending
upon the results of the cell bank and unprocessed
bulk testing, however, the key assays to perform
are:
Microbiological contaminants: Sterility,
mycoplasma
Residual DNA: Host cell DNA assay
|
Final
Filed Product
|
|
The
tests to perform include:
Microbiological contaminants: Sterility
Endotoxin: LAL or Rabbit Pyrogen
Toxicity: Abnormal Toxicity or General
Safety
|
Viral
Clearance Studies
|
|
These
studies are conducted to assess the capacity of the
purification process to remove or inactivate
viruses or other contaminants. The type and extent
of viral clearance studies to be conducted, will
depend on various factors and should be considered
on a case by case basis. The results of the cell
bank testing, in process testing, the nature of the
culture medium used, the product and its
application and the ability of the process to
inactivate or remove viruses, are all factors which
influence the design of the study. When using a
rodent cell line, for example, to manufacture a
biopharmaceutical, the endogenous retroviruses
present in the cells will require the use of a
murine retrovirus in the viral clearance study, as
well as considering the use of other relevant or
model viruses.
|
Regulatory
Guidelines
|
|
Please
consult the Interesting Links pages and visit the
websites of FDA, CPMP and ICH for
documents.
|
Safety
Testing Outline
|
|
The
safety testing strategy should address all the
following stages in the production of a
biopharmaceutical:
|
Master
Cell Bank
|
|
As
all production lots will originate from the MCB,
the safety testing is very comprehensive and
includes the following type of assays. The origin
and history of the cell line will determine the
specific virological or microbiological assays
required:
Microbiological contaminants: Sterility,
mycoplasma
Cell Line Identification: Isoenzyme analysis or DNA
fingerprinting or karyology
Retroviruses: Reverse Transcriptase,Infectivity
Assays, PCR based assays
Adventitious Viruses: In Vitro & In Vivo Assays
for viral contaminants
Specific Virus Assays: Mouse Antibody (MAP) or
Hamster Antibody (HAP) Production Tests; PCR assays
for human or other viruses
Other Virus Assays: Specific Bovine and Porcine
virus assays
|
Working
Cell Bank:
|
|
Normally,
the WCB originates from a well characterised MCR,
so only limited testing is required:
Microbiological contaminants: Sterility,
mycoplasma
Cell
Line Identification: Isoenzyme analysis or DNA
fingerprinting or karyology
Adventitious Viruses: In Vitro and In Vivo Assays
for viral contaminants
|
Cells
at the Limit of in vitro Cell Age or End of
Production Cells
|
|
These
cells should be evaluated once for those endogenous
viruses which may not have been detected in the MCB
and WCB. Also by conducting adventitious virus
assays once, shows that the production process is
not prone to such contamination.
Microbiological contaminants: Sterility,
mycoplasma
Cell Line Identification: Isoenzyme analysis or DNA
fingerprinting or karyology
Retroviruses: Reverse Transcriptase, Infective
Assays, PCR based assays
Adventitious Viruses: In Vitro and In Vivo Assays
for viral contaminants
Other Virus Assays: Specific Bovine and Porcine
viral assays
|
Unprocessed
Bulk
|
|
A
representative sample of the unprocessed bulk,
removed from the bioreactor prior to further
processing, represents one of the most suitable
levels to detect adventitious viral contaminants
with a high probability of detection. The testing
that should be considered includes:
Microbiological contaminants: Sterility,
mycoplasma
Adventitious Viruses: In Vitro and In Vivo Assays
for viral contaminants
Estimation of Retroviral Load: For rodent cell
lines in particular, an electron microscopy assay
should be performed to estimate to the level of
retroviral-like particles
|
|
Back
To Top. | Home | Organization | Members | News
and Info. | Publications | Products | Interesting
Links | library
| Secure | Contact
Us
©
1998 ACTIP
|