|
Next
meeting ACTIP:
Please take note:
the next ACTIP meeting will be held
In
Lund, Sweden on June 16-17, 2005
And will be hosted
by ACTIP member company BioInvent
International.
The programme will
focus on technology aspects of animal cell
cuiltures (batch versus continuous processing, and
the importance of medium optimization), and on stem
cells for research and therapy.
The meeting is only
open for ACTIP members and invited observers.
Please contact the ACTIP
Secretariat. for
more information.
In
this issue:
The
EUs new Research Framework Programme 2007-2013
(FP7)
News
from the Commission
Review
of nanotechnology in pharma
Business
News
Research
News
Short
News various organizations
Agenda
The
EU's new Research Framework Programme
2007-2013
On 6 April 2005,
the Commission adopted its proposal for EU's 7th
Framework Programme, which will follow the current
6th FP (2002-2006) and will cover a 7-year period
(2007-2013). The proposal takes account of the
views expressed by the
other
EU
institutions, the member states and by various
stakeholders
including the scientific community and industry.
The proposal also takes account of the criticism
expressed by the Marimon
report and the
5-year-assessment of the EU research.
Main idea: "The 7th
Framework Programme will not be 'just another
Framework Programme', according to Science and
Research Commissioner Potoènik. Indeed, in
its content, organisation, implementation modes and
management tools, the FP7 is designed as a key
contribution to the relaunched Lisbon strategy. FP7
is centered on innovation and knowledge for growth
and it will continue the drive towards the European
research area (ERA.
Structure
FP7 will be
organised into four specific programmes,
corresponding to four major objectives of European
research policy:
1.
Co-operation: refers to gaining leadership
in key scientific and technology areas by
supporting co-operation between universities,
industry, research centres and public authorities
across the EU and with the rest of the world.
Trans-national cooperation will remain the main
instrument for carrying out research
activities.
This programme will
be organised into 9 sub-programmes (see table 1.
below) covering the nine different thematic
research areas receiving Community support (the so
called thematic priority areas). All FP6 thematic
priorities will continue to be supported in the
FP7. Only one new priority, 'Space and security',
has been added to the previous set of
themes.
Even though the
programme will be organised into operationally
autonomous sub-programmes, joint, cross-thematic
approaches to research subjects of common interest
are allowed.
2. Ideas:
refers to the establishment of an autonomous
European research council (ERC), which will support
and stimulate the creativity and excellence of
European research through the funding of
ground-breaking research carried out by individual
teams competing at European level.
3. People:
refers to the so called 'Marie Curie' actions,
which strengthen training, the career prospects and
mobility of European researchers. Better focus will
be given on key aspects of skills and career
development, increasing mobility between university
and industry, and strengthening links with national
systems.
4.
Capacities: refers to developing and fully
exploiting the EU's research capacities through
large-scale research infrastructure, regional
cooperation and innovating SMEs.
In addition to the
four specific programmes, the FP7 includes a
specific programme for the non-nuclear activities
of the Joint Research Centre (JRC).
Budget
The proposed total
budget for FP7 (64.282 billion) and the Euratom
Treaty research activities (2.800 billion) is
67.082 billion euros. Cooperation and Ideas will
receive around 70 per cent of the funds, People and
Capacities around 20 per cent and the remaining ten
per cent will go to the JRC and the Euratom
programme activities.
The budget has a
yearly average of around 10 billion euros, but the
Commission proposal envisages starting in 2007 with
around six billion euros and increasing the yearly
expenditure gradually to reach 15 billion euros
budget in 2013.
Table 1. The nine
thematic research areas and budget breakdown of the
Cooperation-programme:
|
Information
society
|
11.2
billion euros
|
|
Health
|
7.35
billion euros
|
|
Transport
(including Aeronautics)
|
5.25
billion euros
|
|
Nanosciences,
nanotechnologies, materials and new
production technologies
|
4.27
billion euros
|
|
Security
and space
|
3.5
billion euros
|
|
Energy
|
2.59
billion euros
|
|
Environment
(including climate change)
|
2.24
billion euros
|
|
Food,
agriculture and biotechnology
|
2.17
billion euros
|
|
Socio-economic
sciences and the humanities
|
0.7
billion euros
|
|
Total
|
39.267
|
Next
steps:
This proposal will
now be sent to European Parliament and Council for
adoption (co-decision procedure).
- Jerzy Buzek,
former Polish Prime Minister and member of the
EPP-ED group in the European Parliament was
appointed, on 6 April 2005, Parliament's
official rapporteur for FP7.
- The
Competitiveness Council will have a first look
at the proposal in its meeting on 18 April
2005.
- Without major
delays, the proposal should be adopted before
autumn 2006.
- FP7 will be
fully operational as of 1 January
2007.
See also:
The
Seventh Framework Programme: Cooperation, Ideas,
People and Capacities
Source:
CORDIS News, Friday 22 April 2005
Documents
on FP7
The following definitive versions of FP7 documents are now available on EUR-Lex:
- Communication:
Proposals for the Seventh Framework Programme (
533 KB)
- Communication:
Building the ERA of knowledge for growth ( 213
KB)
- Commission
staff working paper: Simplification in the 7th
Framework Programme, SEC(2005)431 ( 144
KB)
- Commission
staff working paper: Annex to the Proposal for
the Council and European Parliament decisions on
the 7th Framework Programme (EC and Euratom) -
Main Report: Overall summary - Impact assessment
and ex ante evaluation (SEC(2005)430) ( 1.21
MB)
- Memo: EU
research - Building Knowledge Europe: The EU's
new Research Framework Programme
2007-2013
- Towards FP7 -
the CORDIS guide to the preparation of the
Seventh Framework Programme
News
from the Commission
Experts
support the creation of a European Research
Council
An expert panel
installed by the European Commission to assess the
impact of a European Research Council has found
that a pan-European mechanism funding frontier
research would have a major effect on the level of
excellence of research in Europe. In their view, a
European Research Council would be arguably the
single most important means to remedy Europe's
current weakness in high-quality research and in
new, fast-developing research areas. This report
comes only a short time after the European
Commission's proposal for such a mechanism as part
of its proposals for the 2007-2013 Framework
Programme for Research and Development, and
supports the approach to this new body taken by the
Commission.
The report
"Frontier Research: The European Challenge" is the
result of the work of a high-level group set up by
the Commission, chaired by William C. Harris of the
Science Foundation Ireland, and composed of eminent
scientists, research managers and economists from
Europe and the United States. The group was asked
to examine the effects and benefits of creating a
new European funding mechanism to support the very
best research carried out at the frontiers of
knowledge.
The report
identifies a series of key challenges facing
European research that a European Research Council
(ERC) could help address. These include:
- Reinforcing
excellence, with a focus on new, fast-growing
research areas
- Staying ahead
in a world of growing scientific and
technological competition
- Linking science
to technological innovation
- Competing for
talent and attracting the best
researchers
- Encouraging
greater investment from the private
sector
The High Level Group of experts also identified a number of important impacts and benefits above and beyond what can be achieved by national funding mechanisms:
- The ability to
recognize, encourage and support the best talent
through direct competition at pan-European
level
- Selectivity and
agility, enabling resources to be focused on
excellent research in the most promising areas
for the future
- Providing high
status and visibility for truly excellent
research leaders
- Dynamic
structural effects on the European research
system by helping national research structures
to adapt to the evolving European Research
Area
- Economic
benefits by nurturing science-based industry and
attracting more R&D intensive firms in
Europe
- Benefits to
society from investing quickly in the knowledge
necessary to tackle major issues.
The group also
concluded that the potential benefits of the ERC
could not be realized by other means. Unless Europe
makes a commitment to frontier research, it risks
becoming a continent of imitators rather than
innovators.
The Commission has
proposed the establishment of an ERC within its
proposal for FP7.
To read the full
report:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/hleg_fullreport_frontier_research_april2005.pdf
The executive
summary of the report can be found on:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/hleg_exec-sum_frontier_research_april2005.pdf
Source:
EU Press Report, April 21, 2005
Science
and Technology, Europe's future
A general
consultation for views on the Commission proposal
"Science and Technology, the key to Europe's
future- Guidelines for future European Union policy
to support research", was launched in July 2004 and
closed on 15 October 2004. Over 1700 organisations
and individuals from across the European Union and
beyond expressed their views. 97% of respondents
were positive about a stronger support to research
at European level. Over 80% thought that the 6
objectives proposed by the Commission in the June
16 Communication are important or very
important.
The European
Commission proposes a significant expansion of the
European Community research budget for the period
2007-2013 (see article on FP7) and has identified
six major objectives:
- Creating
European centres of excellence through
collaboration between laboratories
- Launching
European technological initiatives
- Stimulating the
creativity of basic research through competition
between teams at European level
- Making Europe
more attractive to the best
researchers
- Developing
research infrastructure of European
interest
- Improving the
coordination of national research
programmes
In its plans, the
Commission proposes using the most efficient means
of implementation, including management through
partnership with the Member States and research
actors, and "externalised" management.
Read the Commission
Communication on the future EU research policy:
Science and Technology, the key to Europe's future
- guidelines for future European Union policy to
support research (also in: ; more information and
other languages are available via
Prelex)
Source:
CORDIS News, April 5, 2005
EU
needs more new researchers
The number of
European researchers may have risen slightly from
5.4 per 1000 of the workforce in 1999 to 5.7 in
2001. But it still remains significantly lower than
the level in the USA (8.1) and Japan
(9.1).
In a bid to change
this situation the Commission wants to make a
career in science more attractive through a
European Charter for Researchers and a Code of
Conduct, adopted on 11 March 2005. The aim is to
give individual researchers the same rights and
obligations wherever they may work throughout the
EU.
Key objectives are
to provide researchers with long term career
prospects by improving their employment and working
conditions, to create more favourable conditions
for mobility within a given research career path
and to introduce different means of judging
scientific merit.
Source:
EurActiv News, March 14, 2005
Tax
incentives for closer university-industry
links
Underfunding and
inflexible systems are so acute in some countries
that they impede the reform process at
universities, says the Commission in a
communication on how to make European universities
contribute fully to the Lisbon strategy.
Encouraging closer
links between universities and industry, the
Commission proposes tax incentives (initially at
least) as a way to promote these
partnerships.
The Commission
laments the fact that EU countries spend on average
just 1.1% of GDP on higher education, on a par with
Japan but much less than Canada (2.5%) and the US
(2.7%). It estimates that an investment of 2% of
GDP is the minimum needed for knowledge-intensive
economies.
Education and
Culture Commissioner Ján Figel is arguing
for in-depth revision of curricula to ensure the
highest level of academic content but also to
respond to the changing needs of labour
markets.
In the
communication, the Commission calls on the Council
to adopt a resolution for a new type of partnership
between the state and universities and for
sufficient investment to make it possible to
modernise the higher education system.
More reading
at:
- DG Education
& Culture: Higher education : Universities
must deliver their full potential to contribute
to the Lisbon strategy (20 April 2005)
[FR] [DE]
- Commission:
Communication - Mobilising the brainpower of
Europe: enabling universities to make their full
contribution to the Lisbon Strategy (20 April
2005)
- Commission:
EU's Higher Education achievements and
challenges: Frequently Asked Questions
(FAQ)
- Commission:
Staff working paper on European higher education
in a worldwide context
Source:
Euractiv News, April 21, 2005
Eurobarometer:
citizens want strong environment policy
In the second half
of 2004, interviews were conducted with nearly
10,000 Eurocitizens to construct a new
Eurobarometer.
Nine out of ten
Europeans say that decision-makers should pay as
much attention to environmental considerations as
to economic and social factors when taking
decisions. Other findings of this
survey:
- people are most
concerned about water pollution, man-made
disasters (oil spills etc.) and climate
change;
- green NGOs are
trusted most (42%), but their rating has gone
down considerably (-6%) since the last poll in
2002; the public's trust in the media (TV and
newspapers) on environmental issues has grown
markedly; people do not trust companies on
environmental issues at all (2%);
- the most
effective level for environmental decisions is
seen to be the EU.
- The survey
confirms a remarkable finding from the February
2005 Eurobarometer on the Lisbon agenda: 63% of
Europeans think that protecting the environment
should take priority over economic
competitiveness (against 24% who
disagree).
- Commission:
Press release "Europeans want policy makers to
consider the environment as important as
economic and social policies" (29 April 2005)
[FR] [DE]
- DG Environment:
Full report: The Attitudes of European citizens
towards environment (April 2005)
[FR]
Source:
Euractiv News, May 2, 2005
Review
of nanotechnology in pharma
Nanotechnology
to revolutionise drug delivery
The emergence of
nanotechnology is likely to have a significant
impact on drug delivery sector, affecting just
about every route of administration from oral to
injectable, according to specialist market research
firm NanoMarkets. NanoMarkets believes that not
only will the nano-enabled drug delivery market be
one of the first true nanomedicine markets to
evolve, but as it does so, the revenues from
nanoenabled drug delivery systems will be quite
large. Below we give a state of the art
overview.
New dosage forms
for injectable drugs. Nanotechnology is
already generating new dosage forms that are easier
to administer, more pleasant for the patient to
receive and confer a competitive advantage in the
marketplace. For example, at the start of this year
Johnson & Johnson revealed that Elan's
NanoCrystal technology would be used in a Phase III
clinical trial for an injectable formulation of
paliperidone palmitate, a drug for schizophrenia.
This is a new 'nano formulation' of an older drug
which overcomes the original's insolubility, by
reducing the particle size to under 200
nm.
Implantable
delivery systems. Implantable time release
systems may help minimize peak plasma levels and
reduce the risk of adverse reactions, allow for
more predictable and extended duration of action,
reduce the frequency of re-dosing and improve
patient acceptance and compliance. Already a
nanostructured material exists that effectively
stores an active compound in nanosised pockets that
release minute amounts of drug as the silicon
dissolves.
Anti-cancer
therapeutics. Among the first nanoscale devices
to show promise in anti-cancer therapeutics and
drug delivery are structures called nanoshells,
which typically have a silicon core that is sealed
in an outer metallic core. By manipulating the
ratio of wall to core, the shells can be precisely
tuned to scatter or absorb very specific
wavelengths of light. For example, gold encased
nanoshells have been used to convert light into
heat, enabling the destruction of tumours by
selective binding to malignant cells. A physician
can use infrared rays to pass harmlessly through
soft tissue, while initiating a lethal application
of heat when the nanoshells are excited.
Some researchers
are also experimenting with temperature-sensitive
drug delivery control methods, using nanoshells
that release their payload only when illuminated
with the proper infrared wavelength.
Oral delivery
systems. Various development groups are working
to enhance traditional oral delivery systems with
nanoengineered improvements. The basic idea is that
by increasing bioavailability, nanoparticles can
increase the yield in drug development and may help
treat previously untreatable conditions.
For example,
researchers at the University of Texas at Austin
have described a means of using nanospheres for
oral drug delivery. These nanosphere carriers are
derived from hydrogels, which are highly stable
organic compounds that swell when their environment
becomes more acidic. They have been successfully
formulated into controlled-release tablets and
capsules, which release active compounds when the
hydrogel body swells.
Crossing the
blood brain barrier. Nanoparticles have been
demonstrated to cross the BBB with little
difficulty and companies such as Germany's
NanoPharm have developed systems capable of
reaching the brain for anaesthesia (Dalargin; an
analgesic), cancer drugs, and various other
therapeutics.
Topical
delivery. Given their very small size,
nanoparticles are able to enter human tissues and
cells quickly, and companies such as Novavax have
already developed regulated topical systems that
take advantage of the unique properties of micellar
nanoparticles. Novavax is developing two hormone
replacement therapies, called Estrasorb (which
received FDA approval in October 2003) and
Androsorb which successfully completed Phase I
human trials in 2003.
Toxin
removal. Colloidal dispersions have been
demonstrated to remove potentially lethal compounds
from the bloodstream, including high concentrations
of lipophilic therapeutics, illegal drugs, and
chemical and biological agents. A team of
scientists at the University of Florida and
Clarkson University in Potsdam, New York, has
demonstrated favourable results to this end, using
biocompatible microemulsions. These oil-in-water
systems have a rapid and efficient absorption
capacity for many target molecules that are
frequently overdosed, whether this be intentional
or accidental. The microemulsions use a polymeric
surfactant, in combination with an ionic
co-surfactant.
Source:
InPharma-technologist.com, March 6,
2005
EU
project aims to make nanotechnology
safe
New drug delivery
systems based on nanoparticles are said to be on
the cusp of delivering significant improvements in
drug therapy, reducing the amount of active drug
that needs to be delivered to the patient,
targeting the medicine more effectively to the site
in the body it is needed, and reducing side
effects, as well as potentially reducing the cost
of therapy. But despite the promise, there are real
concerns that exposing patients to nanoparticles
might unleash unexpected toxicities, a fear backed
up to some extent by the recent discovery that
nanoparticles exposure in animals can lead to
neurological damage.
To explore this
risk further, the European Commission has set up a
research project with partners across industry
(including BASF) and academia aimed at developing
methods for the safe use of
nanoparticles.
As of April 2005,
23 partners from seven EU countries started work on
Nanosafe2, a project with a budget of approximately
12.4 million euros. Around 7 million euros is being
provided by the EU's research funding programme and
the remainder by the companies involved.
The key goal of the
Nanosafe2 research programme is to establish
processes to detect, track and characterise
nanoparticles. Such methods are a prerequisite for
determining any possible risks to man or the
environment, and for further optimising the safety
of production processes and plants.
Nanosafe2 will look
at the entire lifecycle of nanoparticles, from
their production and storage through to transport
and use in a finished product. The results of the
research will subsequently be made available
worldwide in the form of databases, official
procedures and workshops.
Source:
www.In-pharmatechnologist.com,
April 26, 2005
Business
News
Crucell
to make Ebola vaccine for NIH unit
Dutch biotechnology
company Crucell has won a _21.4 million contract to
produce a vaccine against Ebola for the US
government's Vaccine Research Centre.
The contract will
see Crucell using its human cell line PER.C6 to
produce up to 10 batches of vaccine against Ebola,
one of the most virulent diseases known that causes
death in 50 to 90 per cent of clinically ill cases.
The vaccine batches will be used for Phase I and II
clinical trials.
The latest
agreement extends an existing arrangement with the
US National Institutes of Health in the area of
Ebola. Last month, Crucell licensed rights to NIH
patents covering Ebola vaccine components, such as
the antigens and vectors. In addition, the license
covers 'one-shot' emergency vaccination strategies
that have been shown to be effective in animal
models.
Crucell's PER.C6
expression platform has by now been licensed to
numerous companies to produce vaccines and protein
therapeutics. Compared to the most commonly-used
cell lines, such as Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)
cells, PER.C6 does not require amplification of
inserted genes to deliver stable clones.
Source:
www.in-pharmatechnologist.com,
April 14, 2005
Lonza
aims to get bigger in peptides
Lonza is planning a
major exansion of its peptides manufacturing
capacities at Visp, Switzerland. The investment
totals about CHF 24 million (_20m) and is focused
on several areas of Lonza's peptides and
oligonucleotides (tides) large-scale current Good
Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) manufacturing
activities. By expanding its manufacturing
activities Lonza is responding to the increasing
number of new entities entering clinical phase
trials.
The demand for
clinical trial material (CTM) will be met by the
construction of a new mid-scale tides plan, as well
as additional high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) purification and new
freeze-drying equipment.
Source:
www.In-Pharmatechnologist.com,
May 2, 2005
Overcapacity
in biopharma
A second market
research report has found evidence that production
capacity in the market for contract manufacturing
of biopharmaceuticals is now in excess, in contrast
to the hitherto prevailing wisdom that the sector
has been suffering from undercapacity.
The report, just
published by HighTech Business Decisions, suggests
that in 2004 and 2005, the industry has a slight
excess of capacity as new capacity continues to
come on-line in and process improvements are being
made. This ties in with recently-published
research from Frost & Sullivan which
predicted that biomanufacturing will be in
overcapacity through to 2011.
In addition to new
expression technologies, cell line development, and
biomanufacturing platforms offered for mammalian
cell culture and microbial fermentation, some
contractors are gearing up to produce novel product
types that require specific biomanufacturing
expertise such as antibody fragments, fusion
proteins, antibody drug conjugates, gene therapy,
and novel proteins.
The market for
biopharmaceutical contract manufacturing reached
$1.7bn in 2004, with healthy growth forecast for
2006. Based on revenues, the top biopharmaceutical
CMOs include Avecia Biotechnology, Boehringer
Ingelheim, Cambrex Biopharmaceutical Services,
Diosynth Biotechnology, DSM Biologics, Lonza Custom
Manufacturing and Sandoz, according to
HighTech.
Source:
In-pharmatechnologist.com, March 9,
2005
Research
News
Foot
and mouth peptide improves antibody
production
Scientists at US
biotechnology firm Cell Genesys have developed a
gene expression technology that could improve the
commercial production of monoclonal antibodies and
other complex therapeutic proteins. The system
enables the production of full-length monoclonal
antibodies at commercially relevant levels from a
single production cell line, and cuts the time
required to develop cell lines that can be used for
commercial production can be significantly
shortened from months to weeks.
The discovery
relies on the use of a peptide called 2A, derived
from the virus that causes foot and mouth disease,
alongside viral vectors used to deliver genetic
material into cells. To overcome usual problems of
stable expression, the Cell Genesys researchers'
transfect the sequences coding for the light and
heavy chains of the antibody alongside a sequence
that codes for the 2A peptide. The latter acts as a
bridging sequence, allowing both the heavy and
light chains to be read form a single
frame.
The production
levels achieved with the technology may be more
than double those achieved with conventional
technologies. Importantly, this gene expression
technology can potentially provide the same
advantages to the production of therapeutic protein
products, including those comprised of multiple
subunits or polypeptide chains.
Source:
on-line issue Nature Biotechnology, April 17,
2005
Short
news various organizations
New
building for the EDQM
The ceremony to lay
the first stone of the new EDQM building took place
in Strasbourg on 28 April 2005. The new building,
specially designed to function as a European centre
for pharmaceutical excellence, will be completed by
the end of 2006.
Source:
Cordis News, May 2, 2005
News
from EFB
The European
Federation of Biotechnology has opened a new,
permanent EFB European Central Office in Barcelona
on 1st March. The contact details are as
follows:
European Federation
of Biotechnology; Pg. Lluis Companys 23; 08010,
Barcelona Spain
Tel:
+34.93.268.7700
Also, a new General
Secretary, has been appointed:
Christian Suojanen,
General Secretary European Federation of
Biotechnology
Pg. Lluis Companys
23; 08010, Barcelona; Spain
Tel:
+34.93.268.7700
Email:
generalsecretary@mail-central.com
Agenda
Stem
cell strategies
May 12-13, Anaheim,
California USA
Information:
www.nsti.org/StemCellStrategies
EU
chemistry and pharmacy regulatory procedures and
requirements
for marketing authorizations applications
- The Pharmaceutical Dossier (CTD 'Quality' Modules
2.3 and 3)
12&13 May
Cork
26&27 September
Budapest
17&18 November
Barcelona
More information:
www.management-forum.co.uk/Filestore/Brochures/5-6005,A9-61,11-60%20LW.pdf
Quality
control of medicinal products: place and role of
the European OMCL
Network
within
the regulatory framework in Europe"
May 27, 2005,
University La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
More information:
EDQM, http://www.pheur.org
ESACT
2005
5 - 8 June 2005 -
Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK
Information:
www.esact2005.org
Novel
target class: microRNA in Human Disease and
Development
June 12, 2005, San
Francisco, Ca USA
Information:
https://commerce22.datapipe.com/chidb/2005/byg/reg.asp
2005
AAPS National Biotechnology
Conference
June 5-8, 2005, San
Francisco, Ca, USA
Information:
www.aapspharmaceutica.com/nationalbiotech
EAPB
Membership meeting
June 13, Nice,
France
Information:
www.efb.org
cGMP
training for Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical
Industries in Europe
June 13-14, London,
UK
For more
information: www.usaspi.com
ACTIP
meeting
June 16-17, 2005,
Lund, Sweden
Information:
ACTIP
Secretariat
Improving
Solubility & Permeability in Drug
Candidates
June 23-24, London
UK
Information:
www.iqpc-pharma.com/GB-2453/S.
ECB12
August 21-24, 2005,
Copenhagen, Denmark
Information:
www.efb.org
International
Congress of Nanotechnology 2005
October 31 to
November 4, 2005, San Francisco, USA
Information:
http://nanotechcongress.com
|