|
Next
meeting
Please note that the
next ACTIP meeting will take place
in
December 11-12,
2003
in
Montreux, Switzerland, hosted by company
Serono.
The central themes of the
meeting will be:
- the use of serum free
medium in animal cell technology (dec
11)
- toxicogenomics (dec
12)
We hope to see many of our
members and SMEs working on these themes in
Montreux.
Please guard the date!
In this
issue
ACTIP
website
Fewer
new pharmaceuticals registered in
2003
News
from the Commission
- Commission proposes
disease prevention centre
- Research and innovation
key to growth in Europe
- Model for
innovation
- Busquin wants more brain
research
- More money, careers,
space and bioethics
- Stop the brain drain: how
to improve research careers
European
Research Council
On
the web
Business
News
- Solvay to build new cell
culture facility
- Jena heads shortlist of
sites for new Merck plant
- FDA approval for API
facility Diosource
Research
News
- 'Omics' centre in
London
- Boost for prion research
in the US
- Test on RNA marker for
BSE in live cattle
- Powerful genomics test
for West Nile virus
- Proactive prevention plan
for blood supply
- EU to fund SARS research
and prevention programme
- R&D in US budget for
2004
Stem
cell news
- Academics challenge
politicians on stem cells
- Stem cells to heal heart
attacks?
- Council adopts human
tissues and cells proposal
- Proposal for strict
ethical guidelines on EU funding of human
embryonic stem cell research
- Approved stem cell
lines
Environmental
impact of antibiotics
EMBO
Award for Communication in the Life Sciences
2003
AGENDA
ACTIP
website
In the months of May, June
and July, the ACTIP website received respectively
19,350, 12,565 and 10,448 requests for access. The
numbers for downloaded pages were 5,282 (May),
2,860 (June) and 2,663 (July). The majority of
requests originate from addresses with a .com
ending (between 20-30%). Most visitors come
directly to the ACTIP home page (70%), and not
through a search machine such as Google or Yahoo.
This indicates that the majority of visitors either
types in the address of the ACTIP website directly
or has the address bookmarked.
The most popular pages are
links, members, bulletins and publications, with
the monographs on animal cell technology in general
and monoclonal antibodies favorites.
Fewer
new pharmaceuticals registered in 2003
Since 1998, there is a trend
that fewer pharmaceuticals have been registered for
marketing. In 2002, only 30 new drugs were approved
in the US and 20 in the EU.
One reason is the mergers
into mega-companies, resulting in a selecting of
potential drug candidates with a concentration on
potential blockbuster drugs. Despite the recent
trends, larger companies expect the tide to turn in
the future. In 2003, 6,994 new active substances
and projects were being researched (a 9% increase
compared to 2002). The European Commission will
start this fall a study trying to determine whether
there is a worldwide innovation crisis in the
pharmaceutical industry and what might be its
causes. The FDA has already started an action plan
to decrease the time and costs involved in the
registration process.
For detailed information,
see:
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/3003/beyond2002/report.html
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2003/beyond2002/execsumm.html
Top 10
companies for R&D
products
(source:
SCRIP may 14, 2003)
|
Company
|
R&D
products
|
Own products
|
|
1.
GSK
|
190
|
112
|
|
2.
Roche
|
139
|
78
|
|
3.
J&J
|
123
|
60
|
|
4.
Aventis
|
122
|
70
|
|
5.
Pfizer
|
97
|
54
|
|
6.
AstraZeneca
|
92
|
60
|
|
7.
Novartis
|
87
|
54
|
|
8. Merck
& Co
|
81
|
53
|
|
9. Schering
AG
|
80
|
82
|
|
10.
Abbott
|
80
|
119
|
US biotech versus EU
biotech
Here are some interesting
data concerning biotechnology companies in the US
versus Europe (source:
Ernst & Young, 2002).
Number of biotech companies:
1,457 US 1,879 EU
Turnover (Mil USD) 25,319 US
7,533 EU
R&D (in mil USD) 11,532
US 4,244 EU
Employees 141,000 US 34, 180
EU
News
from the Commission
Commission
proposes disease prevention centre
To be able to respond faster
to health threats, such as SARS, and to increase
preparedness for a possible bio-terrorist attack,
the Commission has proposed the creation of a new
agency, the European Centre for Disease prevention
and Control (ECDC). With a small core staff, the
Centre for Disease Prevention and Control would
draw together the expertise of hundreds of
scientists around Europe. The Centre would improve
upon Europe's communicable disease network already
in place and would take over the work on monitoring
and preparedness planning against bioterrorist
attack so far pursued by the EU's Health Security
Task Force.
The main tasks of the ECDC
would be:
Epidemiological surveillance
and laboratory networking across the EU - to
increase the comparability and compatibility of the
surveillance data collected and to maintain
networks of reference laboratories;
Early warning and response -
24 hour availability of disease experts;
Scientific opinions - the
ECDC would provide scientific assessments and
technical support based on its in-house expertise
and that of its networks in the Member
States;
Technical assistance - the
ECDC could provide such assistance to the countries
in the European Economic Area, candidate countries,
as well as to third countries, to investigate an
outbreak of an unknown human disease;
Forward planning against
health crises;
Communicating on health
threats - the ECDC would make accessible essential
information on health threats to the general public
as well as for decision-makers.
The proposal will be
forwarded to the European Parliament and the
Council for consideration under the codecision
procedure. If all goes as expected, the new Centre
could be operational in 2005.
Source:
Euractive July 24, see also the Commission
documents
Strengthening Europe's
defences against health threats: Commission
proposes European Centre for Disease Prevention and
Control
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/615359
707?714&1015=8&1014=WWWEUROPAEUINTHPACTIONGETTXTGTDOCIP0310910RAPIDLGFRDISPLAY"
\t "OTHR" [FR]
Commission / DG Public Health:
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/615359-707?714&1015=8&1014=WWWEUROPAEUINTHPACTIONGETTXTGTDOCIP0310910RAPIDLGDEDISPLAY"
\t "OTHR"
[DE] (23 July 2003)
European Centre for Disease
Prevention and Control (ECDC)
Research
and innovation key to growth in
Europe
A report prepared by an
independent high level study group at the request
of Commission President Romano Prodi has outlined a
path for growth in Europe, which sees an emphasis
on innovation, research and higher education. "The
Group views Europe's unsatisfactory growth
performance during the last decades as a symptom of
its failure to transform into an innovation-based
economy," states the report. This change has become
necessary in the context of globalisation and
because Europe no longer needs to concentrate on
reproducing what is done in the US, but on doing it
better, according to the report.
"Europe suffers from a lack
of private sector investment in R&D,
substantial although diminishing levels of public
investment in R&D and poor efficiency in the
distribution of available public funds," according
to the high level group. It is proposed that these
weaknesses are addressed through tax credits for
R&D and innovative investments, and additional
public research spending at both national and EU
level. The report questions the models used for the
allocation of research funding across Europe. It
criticises the 'juste retour' principle, whereby
each party gets back the equivalent of what it has
paid in, for not paying enough attention to
prioritisation or excellence.
Centrally directed research
programmes, such as the European Commission's
Framework Programmes for research, are also
questioned. The high level group claims that, in
general, the funding system can be lengthy and
bureaucratic, and the projects selected for funding
tend to be large and 'can quickly turn in to white
elephants.' The report also recommends the creation
of an independent European agency for science and
research (EASR), based on the US National Science
Foundation, as well as the Nordic and British
research councils.
To access the report in full,
visit http://europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/prodi/pdf/agenda_for_growing_europe_en.pdf
.
Model for
innovation
The European Commission's
Enterprise DG has published a book entitled
'entrepreneurial innovation in Europe', which
summarises 11 recent reports on innovation
policies, and outlines a European model for 'smart'
innovation policy.
The book is designed to help
regional, national and EU policy makers
strengthening Europe's innovation capacity through
the introduction of effective, targeted legislation
and support measures. The impact of industrial
relations policies on innovation is the focus of
the fourth chapter. The study outlines a generic
model of innovation friendly industrial policies,
which include direct and indirect forms of employee
consultation.
The final section assesses
corporate taxation as a means of encouraging
companies to make innovation related investments.
It concludes that well designed tax incentives,
adapted to local circumstances, can encourage
additional business investment in research and
development.
See the publication at
http://www.cordis.lu/innovation-policy/studies/ca_study4.htm
.
Busquin
wants more brain research
European Commissioner
Philippe Busquin has called for more investment on
research into brain disease. He spoke this at the
launch of the European Brain Council (EBC) at the
EP late June. Busquin found it ìsurprising
that more funds are not devoted to this area of
scienceî. Brain diseases account for 30% of
the financial cost of treating diseases
worldwide.
Source:
European Voice,
June 19-25, 2003
More
money, careers, space and bioethics
At the Lisbon Council in
March 2000, the Heads of States and Government
agreed to make the EU the most competitive and
dynamic, knowledge-based economy by 2010 In line
with this aim, the overarching objective of the
Research Commissioner Busquin during the Italian
presidency will be to continue the efforts to
create a more favorable overall framework for
research in Europe to realize the vision of a
genuine integrated European Research Area
(ERA).
To achieve this, the
Commission is planning to focus on six broad policy
areas:
The 3% objective: meeting the
target of increasing research investment from the
current 1.9% to 3% of its GDP per year, with two
thirds financed by the private sector, as called
for by the 2002 Barcelona European Council; this
would mean a necessary increase of 500,000
jobs.
Attractiveness of
researchers' careers: providing researchers with
support and incentives to stop the so-called "brain
drain", i.e. researchers leaving the EU to work in
other countries such as the US or Japan; the
Commission will present a Communication on this
issue
International Thermonuclear
Experimental Reactor (ITER): progressing on the
ITER nuclear fusion energy research project to
build a new experimental reactor producing a high
level of energy through the fusion of hydrogen
nuclei at very high temperatures in order to
provide the EU with another important alternative
energy source to fossil fuels; agreement on the
location of ITER is expected at the September
Council meeting (candidates are Vandellos, Spain,
and Cadarache, France).
European Space Policy:
defining and implementing a coherent set of rules
for collaboration between the European Commission
and the European Space Agency (ESA) to give the EU
a political rule in the field of space; the Council
should conclude a frameword agreement between the
EU and the ESA at its November meeting and discuss
a White Paper on European Space Policy, which will
be drafted by the Commission in co-operation with
ESA and should be published before the end of
2003.
Bio-ethics: research
involving human embryonic stem cells and human
embryos: the key challenge for the Italian
presidency will be to reach an agreement on a
Commission proposal for establishing criteria for
EU funding of research projects involving the use
of human embryonic stem cells; ministers are
expected to adopt a Decision at the Competitiveness
Council in November 2003.
Research infrastructures: the
Italian Presidency will organize a conference in
Trieste on 21 November to assess progress of
European cooperation in the field of research
infrastructure and stimulate further initiatives;
research infrastructure is also expected to be a
formal agenda item at the Competitiveness Council
in November 2003.
Source:
Euractive, July
17, 2002
Stop the
brain drain: how to improve research
careers
The Commission's Third Report
on Science and Technology indicators revealed a
growing trend of "brain drain" in the EU. Although
the EU produces the highest amount of science
graduates, it loses an increasing number of highly
qualified researchers to the US, where their
employment prospects are better .
To address this problem, the
Commission on 18 July 2003 presented a
Communication on improving the careers of
researchers in the EU. This paper proposes concrete
actions to improve the image of researchers, to
attract more people to scientific careers and to
foster researchers' mobility across
Europe.
These initiatives are
designed to provide a basis for cooperation with
the EU Member States and the research community,
while respecting the subsidiarity principle, and
they include:
- "European Researcher's
Charter" for the career management of human
resources in R&D;
- "Code of conduct for the
recruitment of researchers" in the
EU;
- framework for the
recording and recognition of professional
achievements of researchers throughout their
careers;
- creation of a platform
for social dialogue of researchers;
- improvement of the
content of research training;
- access to funding and
social security benefits for doctoral
candidates.
The Commission has already
launched a number of initiatives in this area,
including EU training and mobility schemes for
researchers, such as the Marie Curie Actions, and a
EU mobility portal. It will also soon complete the
creation of the European network of mobility
centres (ERA-MORE) and a legal
initiative.
Sources:
Commission Press
Release: www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/597727-561?714&1015=8&1014=EUROPAEUINTNKSHPACTIONGETTXTGTDOCIP0310510RAPIDLGENDISPLAY"
\t "OTHR Taking
action to stop EU brain drain: Commission proposes
measures to improve researchers' careers (18 Juli
2003)
Commission:
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/597727-561?714&1015=8&1014=EUROPAEUINTESEARCHPRESS2003PDFINDICATORS20032MOBILITYENPDF"
\t "OTHR Brain Drain
and Brain Gain in Europe: Science and Technology
Indicators 2003 (March 2003)
Commission:
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/597727-561?714&1015=8&1014=EUROPAEUINTCOMMRESEARCHFP6MARIECURIEACTIONSHOMEENHTML"
\t "OTHR Marie Curie
Actions
Commission:
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/597727-561?714&1015=8&1014=EUROPAEUINTERACAREERSINDEXENCFM"
\t "OTHR The
Researcher's Mobility Portal
European
Research Council
The debate on the European
Research Council is progressing. The meeting held
in Paris in February 2003 succeeded in moving the
debate on the ERC from informed circles to
grass-root life scientists, the primary potential
users of the ERC. The users send out a loud and
clear message of support. However, as one of the
participants said, 'we cannot sell ideas'. More
work is now required to present politicians and
others with clear plans for possible ERC
structures, programmes and working mechanisms based
on the perspectives highlighted during the meeting.
There was consensus on the ERC having a lean
administration, decisions to be based on scientific
excellence, and a structure covering all scientific
disciplines. EMBO was repeatedly mentioned as a
role model".
The ACTIP Steering Committee
is drafting a position paper on the ERC. Here are
some quotes that me help is in our assessment of
the issues:
"European research must act
as a counterweight to that of the US, and
particularly to that of US corporations". Prof John
Sulston, Sanger Centre Cambridge.
"The Howard Huges Scheme (a
large amount of money to researchers with the
freedom of doing research) is an example of how you
can achieve a lot with relatively little money".
Prof Christiane Nusslein-Volhard.
"What is needed is the
support of science in the long term, with
independence for the ERC and not more than 5-10% of
the money invested on political directives". Prof
Rolf Zinkernagel
"DG Research welcomes the
move towards an ERC, but not with unconditional
support: the ERC should not duplicate or compete
with EC Framework Programmes or national
programmes; it should provide European added value
and help to improve the quality of science; it
should raise new money for research". Peter Kind,
EC
"National systems should not
suffer form the existence of an ERC". Heidi
Diggelman.
"To have a significant
impact, the budget needs to be 20-40 billion
EURO/year". Prof Rolf Zinkernagel.
Source:
EuroBiotechNews, no 1, vol 2, 2003, pp
33-35
On
the web
EU tenders and
subsidies
Free of charge: Tenders
Electronic Daily, covering public tenders of the
EU
http://ted.publications.eu.int"
http://ted.publications.eu.int
Innovation Relay
Centres
Local contact point (53 in
Europe) to address for help regarding technology
transfer to and from the rest of Europe
http://www.cordis.lu/irc/home.html"
www.cordis.lu/irc/home.html
National focal
points
National contact points for
FP6 in member states to provide help with finding
partners and assisting in procedural or
administrative matters
http://www.cordis.lu/fp6/ncp.htm"
http://www.cordis.lu/fp6/ncp.htm
Research
online
Europan Research Gateways On
Line. National information on R&D projects,
coordinated by the EC.
www.cordis.lu/ergo
EU national and European
funded research in the EU member states
www.cordis.lu/national_service
EU funded TSE
research
Europa.eu.int/comm./research/quality-of-life/tse/index_en.html
Developments in European
science in the on-line European Research News
Centre
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/news-centre/index_en.html
Who's who in the
EU:
http://europa.eu.int/idea/idea.html
Who's who in European
research support
www.cordis.lu/contacts
How to register as an expert
evaluator:
www.cordis.lu/expert-candidature/home.html
IFAH International Federation
for Animal Health:
www.ifahsec.org
Business
News
Solvay to
build new cell culture facility
In the future, it will be
possible to quicker realize large quantities of
vaccines for new flu variants thanks to the
construction of a new animal cell culture facility
of Solvay Pharmaceuticals in Weesp, the
Netherlands. Construction has started this spring.
The facility should be operational before the flu
vaccination season of 2005. The use of animal cell
technology for the production of flu vaccines is
new; formerly, flu vaccines were obtained by
culturing viruses in chicken eggs. At Solvay
Pharmaceuticals the cell line will be Madin Darby
Canine Kidney (MDCK). Competitor Baxter is also
building a cell culture facility for the production
of flu vaccine; this facility will be located in
Austria. Both Solvay and Baxter have obtained
marketing approval for their cell technology based
flu vaccines in the Netherlands.
Source:
Bionieuws June
2003
Jena heads
shortlist of sites for new Merck
plant
Germanyís Merch KGaA
will focus its planning efforts for a new
largeóscale production plant for therapeutic
proteins in Jena in the Eastern German state of
Thuringia. Also on the short list of potential
locations are Durham in North Carolina, US and
Boston, Massachusetts, US. The investment will be
the largest single investment in the
companyís 335 year history. However, the
basic decision to build the plant has yet to be
made. The investment would be near 300 million EURO
and provide 260 new jobs and 20 trainee
positions.
Source:
EuroBiotechNews No
1, vol 2, 2003
FDA
approval for API facility Diosource
Akzo Nobelsí Diosynth
in Oss, the Netherlands, has built a new facility
for cell culture and fermentation, called
Diosource. Recently, the facility received FDA
approval for the production of APIs (Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredients). The facility can
handle animal cell cultures as well as microbial
fermentations. Diosource will produce for Akzo
Nobel company Organon, as well as for third parties
such as Pfizer. With 18,000 L, Diosource has
Europeís largest animal cell culture
facility. At present, all equipment and procedures
are being validated. Production is expected to
start in 2004.
Source:
Bionieuws June 4,
2003
Research
News
'Omics'
centre in London
Modern scientific advances
have led to a new generation of ëomicí
sciences. Now, for the first time, all those
sciences have become integrated under one roof in a
ëBiomics Research Centreí at St Georges
Hospital Medical School in London UK. The Biomics
Centre brings together genomics, proteomics,
metabolomics and transcriptomics capabilities to
conduct medical research into cancer, infectious
and cardiovascular diseases and transplantation.
The Centre is partly funded by a Science Research
Investment Grant (SRIF) of the Higher Education
Funding Council for England.
Source:
Bioventure View,
April 2003
Boost for
prion research in the US
In 2002, the Department of
Defense (DOD) launched the US National Prion
research Program, with a budget of 42,5 million USD
for research grants in this area. The Institute of
Medicine (IOM) has been asked by the DOD to prepare
a research agenda for the first round of grants.
Research on TSEs in the US has been hampered by a
lack of funding and a shortage of research
investigators with a wide range of expertise. One
of the incentives of the program will be for
achieving a rapid diagnostic test that is sensitive
and specific enough to detect minute amounts of
prions without producing false positives. Other
objectives are funding of basic research into the
structural features of prion replication, the
mechanisms of TSE pathogenesis, the epidemiology
and natural history of TSEs, and the physiologic
function of normal prion proteins.
For more information, see
www.iom.edu
Test on
RNA marker for BSE in live cattle
US company Chronix
Biomedical, together with the University of
Gottingen, recently developed a blood test able to
detect BSE in live bovines. The test does not
measure the presence of prions, but an RNA-marker
that is indicative of the physiological reaction on
the prion. So far, only 5 animals have been tested
with it. It would take at least 4-5 years before
the test will have been fully validated.
Source:
Bionieuws 10, May
23, 2003
Powerful
genomics test for West Nile virus
Bio-ID Diagnostic Inc., a
diagnostic genomics company based in Saskatoon,
Canada, has developed a DNA sequence based test for
the West Nile Virus that has distinct features
compared to any other tests on the market. The test
can be used to diagnose the condition in
symptomatic patients and animals, and also to
detect the virus in blood donations from otherwise
healthy individuals.
The test can detect the
difference between the various strains of West Nile
virus, as well as identify related viruses, such as
Yellow fever, Dengue fever, and encephalitis. The
test can also be effective in epidemic situations
to track spread, identify source, and detect
changes that may affect virulence and
pathogenicity.
Source:
www.bio-id-diagnostic.com
Proactive
prevention plan for blood supply
At the end of June, a hearing
was held in the European Parliament on
ëemerging virusesí. Prompted by the
SARS epidemic, the members of parliament were told
that emerging viruses such as SARS pose an
ëenormous potential threatí to the
safety of blood supplies in the EU. Since 1976, at
least 19 new infectious diseases have emerged,
including SARS and new variant CJD, with
international travel and increased mobility all
contributing to them spreading. An EU Commission
official told the hearing that the EU Executive was
pushing through new policies aimed at protecting
blood supplies and patients needing blood
transfusions. However, some deputies said that,
despite such assurances, the EU needed to
ërevisit existing legislation intended to
ensure a uniformly high level of safety of all
blood components for member states. ëOur goal
is to develop a proactive prevention plan
implemented across Europe that will allow us to be
prepared for the next emerging virus outbreak and
not wait until it is too lateí.
Source:
European Voice,
June 26-July 2, 2003
EU to fund
SARS research and prevention
programme
On 3 July, Research
Commissioner Philippe Busquin announced that 9
million euro will be allocated in a special call to
SARS research under the Sixth Framework Programme
for Research. Although the immediate dangers from
the current SARS outbreaks seem to have lessened
and no death cases have been reported in the EU,
there are still concerns about the possible
resurgence of the virus. The reappearance of SARS
can be worrying as much information is still
lacking concerning its transmission, reservoirs,
stability and origin.
This special call aims at
addressing this knowledge gap, covering
surveillance and control; clinical manifestations,
including disease transmission; infection control
procedures; interventions and vaccines; as well as
risk assessment. The SARS research will be funded
by the Sixth Research Framework Programme thanks to
the inclusion of a new flexible mechanism called
"Policy Oriented research", which allows a rapid
response to urgent scientific support
needs.
Source:
Euractive July 4,
2003
Commission:
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/523119-367?714&1015=8&1014=WWWEUROPAEUINTUESTENKSHPACTIONGETTXTGTDOCIP039400RAPIDLGEN"
\t "OTHR Commission
to invest EUR 9 million into research for SARS
prevention (3 July 2003)
Sixth Framework Programme:
www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/523119-367?714&1015=8&1014=FP6CORDISLUFP6CALLDETAILSCFMCALLID84"
\t "OTHR
Policy-orientated research ó Special Call on
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
R&D in
US budget for 2004
On February 2003, the US
federal plans for the R&D budget for the year
2004 were announced. Subject to discussions in the
US senate, these plans give a good idea of research
directions and choices made. Here some key
data:
total budget 122.7 billion
USD. A record, 6,7% higher than the proposed budget
for 2003 and 13.8% higher than the 2002
budget;
9.1% increase in the budget
of the Department of defense (DOD), which will
absorb 2/3 of the total federal R&D
budget
31.5% increase in the budget
of the new Department of Homeland Security.
Emphasis on defense technologies against chemical,
biological and nuclear weapons, but also
biometrics;
10% budget increase for the
National Science Foundation, to counteract the
strong focus on biomedical research of the past few
years. Now more budget for physics, mathematics,
chemistry and material sciences
High priority for the three
multiagency initiatives: 847 milUSD for
nanotechnology (9.4 % increase), 2.2 bilUSD for
information technology (5.9% increase); no increase
(1.7 bilUSD) for the Global Change Research
Program;
Only 2% budget increase for
the national Institute of Health (NIH), signaling
that the doubling trajectory of the past years
truly will be finished in 2004. But following the
doubling efforts of the past few years, NIH is now
a rich and powerful institute;
Priority within NIH budget
will be given to the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (increase 8.9% to 4.3
bilUSD)
Decrease of 9% for the
Department of Commerce (but for years congress has
been able to torpedo such proposed
decreases).
Source:
Technieuws vol 41,
no 2, 2003
Stem
cell news
Academics
challenge politicians on stem cells
In the US, the debate on stem
cell research received a new impetus with a
publication in the New England Journal of Medicine
by academics unhappy with the current political
debate.
Several national bills have
been proposed aimed at curtailing stem cell
research; in some states bills take the form of a
total ban on nuclear transplants (thus prohibiting
both reproductive as well as therapeutic cloning);
in other it is proposed to introduce a limited ban
on research with embryonal stem cells. In addition,
the various states have their own laws. There is a
total ban in the states of Arkansas, Iowa, Michigan
and North Dakota, a ban on reproductive cloning in
Louisiana and Missouri and in California the
reverse has happened: there a law has been passed
aimed at stimulating stem cell
research.Ý
In their article, the
academics argue that research into reprogramming
adult stem cells would benefit substantially if
research with current methods is allowed, including
nuclear transplants to create new embryonal stem
cell lines. Laws that would prohibit such research
would ultimately hamper research into reprogramming
of adult stem cells.
Source:
Daley George Q., Cloning and Stem Cells -
Handicapping the Political and Scientific Debates,
New England Journal for Medicine 349:3 p. 265-266,
July 17, 2003
Rosenthal Nadia,
Prometheus's Vulture and the Stem-Cell Promise, New
England Journal for Medicine 349:3, p. 267-274,
July 17, 2003
Stem cells
to heal heart attacks?
Several articles in Nature
have been addressing the issue whether bone marrow
stem cells are able to repair heart damage. Two
years ago, researchers claimed to have been able to
repair damaged heart tissue in mice using mouse
bone marrow stem cells. Apart from repair, also the
heart function improved. In other research rats
with an induced heart attack were injected with
angiogenic stem cells. In these rats, new blood
vessels were formed, further dying of heart muscle
cells was stopped and the pump function
improved.ÝHowever, many of the injected stem
cells poorly survived.
Recently, Victor Dzau of the
Bringham and Women's Hospital in Boston (USA)
genetically modified bone marrow stem cells to
survive better (they introduced a ëcell
survival gene). These cells were injected into rats
with a previously induced heart attack. More than
60% of the cells survived 48 hours and thereby
prevented a further deterioration of the heart.
Some researchers now speculate that repair of human
hearts following a heart attack will be possible in
the short term.
Long-lived stem cells heal
heart attacks, Nature, 11 August 2003,
www.nature.com/nsu/030804/030804-15.html
Hope stems for broken hearts,
Nature, 31 March 2001,
www.nature.com/nsu/010404/010404-4.html
Council
adopts human tissues and cells
proposal
The Council has formally
adopted its common position on the proposed new law
setting quality and safety standards for the
handling of human tissues and cells. This
legislation will introduce more stringent
requirements on the suitability of donors,
screening of donated substances, as well as the
traceability from donor to patient and vice versa.
Rules for third country imports will also be
established ensuring equivalent standards of
quality and safety.
The legislative proposal will
now be forwarded to the European Parliament for a
second reading.
Source:
Euractive portal,
July 24: www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe/615349-701?714&1015=9&1014=ld_humantissue
Legislation on human tissues and cells
Proposal
for strict ethical guidelines on EU funding of
human embryonic stem cell research
On July 9, 2003, the
Commission adopted a proposal for guidelines on EU
funded human embryonic stem cell research. The
proposal presents a coherent set of strict ethical
guidelines that will apply to the EU funding of
research projects involving the derivation of stem
cells from human supernumerary embryos. In
parallel, the Commission is publishing a call for
proposals for the set-up of a European registry of
stem cells and for contributing to the
establishment of public stem cell banks. In this
way, the EU will contribute to an optimal access to
and use of stem cells, ensuring that the results of
research ultimately become more quickly available
to all patients across Europe.
The Commission proposal does
not aim to set universal ethical principles, nor
does it aim to provide guidelines for EU Member
States, since every Member State must decide for
itself on this issue. The proposal is fully in line
with the various opinions of the European Group on
Ethics (EGE), in particular opinion n15 of November
14, 2000, "Ethical aspects of human stem cell
research and use". The Framework Programme respects
national rules and values as no funding is made
available for a specific research activity in a
Member State where that research is
forbidden.
It proposes the following
guidelines:
The EU will not fund human
embryonic stem cell research where it is forbidden
by a Member State;
Human embryonic stem cells
can only be derived from supernumerary embryos that
are donated for research by parents and that were
created before 27 June 2002, the date of the
adoption of the Framework Programme. These embryos
are destined to be destroyed at some point in
time;
Potential research project
partners applying for EU funding must seek ethical
advice at national or local level in Member States
where the research will take place, even in
countries where obtaining such ethical advice is
not mandatory;
Research will be funded only
when it is demonstrated that it meets particularly
important research objectives;
Research will be funded only
when there is no adequate alternative available. In
particular, it must demonstrated that one cannot
use existing embryonic or adult stem cell
lines;
Supernumerary embryos will be
used only if informed consent has been given by the
donor(s);
Embryo donor(s) will not be
permitted to make any financial gain;
Data and privacy protection
of donors must be guaranteed;
Traceability of stem cells
will be required;
Research consortia will be
required to engage in making available new human
embryonic stem cells to other
researchers.
The Commission intends to
fund the creation of a European registry, an
initiative advocated by nearly all Member States.
Such a registry at European level should reduce the
need for derivation of stem cells from human
supernumerary embryos in the future.
Collaborative research at EU
level should contribute to a reduction of the use
of human embryos. By sharing resources and results
within a European project, duplication of research
activities will be reduced. Furthermore, more rapid
scientific progress can be achieved by bringing
together multidisciplinary teams.
Approved
stem cell lines
In the year 2002, a total of
78 stem cell lines had been approved for federal
funded research in the US:
- BresaGen In, Athens GA:
n=4
- CyThera Inc, San Diego,
n=9
- ES Cell International,
Melbourne Australia n=6
- Geron Corp, Menlo Park
n=7
- Goteborg University,
Sweden n=19
- Karolinska Institute
Stockholm n=6
- Maria Biotech Ltd Seoul
n=3
- Seoul National University
n=1
- NCBS, Bangalore, India
n=3
- Pochon University Seoul
n=2
- Reliance Life Sciences
Bombay India n=7
- Technion University Haifa
Israel n=4
- UCSF n=2
- Wisconsin Alumni Research
Foundation n=5
Useful web
sites:
Human embryonic stem cell
registry: http://escr.nih.gov"
http://escr.nih.gov
AAAS stem cell policy brief
www.aaas.org/spp/cstc/issues/stemcells.htm
AAAS human cloning policy
brief: www.aas.org/spp/cstc/issues/cloning.htm"
Environmental
impact of antibiotics
The results of three European
research projects (ERAVMIS, REMPHARMAWATER and
POSEIDON) covering 13 European countries and
establishing the environmental impact of human and
veterinary antibiotics and possible solutions,was
presented to the press for the first time on 27
June in Gryaab, Gteborg (Sweden), at
Scandinaviaís Swedenís largest
waste-water processing treatment plant. Antibiotics
can find their way into our environment, with
harmful and worrying consequences. In the last
decade 12,500 billion tons of antibiotics per year
were consumed and consumption continues to
increase. These compounds are partly degraded by
the body but thousands of tons of antibiotics still
enter the environment each year by excretion.
Recent findings confirm that antibiotics can now be
found in municipal sewage waste water and
agricultural waste. If nothing is done, these
antibiotics will contaminate our water resources
and soils.
"The knowledge of what
happens with antibiotics after their use, once they
are released into the environment, has been very
limited until now," said Research Commissioner
Philippe Busquin. "Research in this field started
in mid 1980s in Europe, and since then we have been
leaders on this issue world-wide, discovering not
only the impacts on the environment, but proposing
solutions to avoid or minimize it.
The residues of various
drugs, painkillers, birth control pills and
medicines used to treat cardiovascular and heart
diseases, have been detected in sewage treatment
plants and raw water resources in many European
countries. The removal rates of individual
compounds through the wastewater treatment are
variable, and some standard removal techniques are
not capable of eliminating all of these compounds.
As a consequence of this incomplete removal, rivers
and even ground waters in some countries are also
contaminated.
The three European projects
have studied the behavior and impact of antibiotics
in the environment, as well as the most effective
techniques to eliminate these compounds, both at
waste-water and drinking water treatment
processes.
ERAVMIS: Addressing the
behaviors and effects of veterinary antibiotics in
the environment. Eravmis: www.cranfield.ac.uk/ecochemistry/eravmis
REMPHARMAWATER:
Eco-toxicological assessment and removal
technologies of antibiotics in waste-waters.
Rempharmawater: www.unina.it/~rmarotta
POSEIDON: A "solution - world
first": antibiotics can be eliminated during the
treatment process in order to prevent its release
into the environment, as proved in the pilot
demonstration in Braunschweig waste water treatment
plant (DE).
Poseidon: www.eu-poseidon.com/
Source:
Euractiv news,
June 2003
EMBO
Award for Communication in the Life Sciences
2003
Last year the European
Molecular Biology Organisation launched the EMBO
Award for Communication in the Life Sciences, which
was awarded to Ronald Plasterk from the
Netherlands. Such was the success of this
initiative, that it was decided to continue it in
2003.
The award is intended for a
life scientist who, while remaining active in
research, has succeeded in making an outstanding
contribution to the communication of science to the
public. The award consists of a silver and gold
medal, and the sum of Euro 5.000, which the winner
may dispose of as she/he sees fit.
Apart from the condition that
candidates must be in active research, the scope of
activities that are eligible is broad. Whether the
communication be via the media, books, public
outreach projects, or special initiatives (for
example schools projects), particular emphasis is
placed on originality and imagination.
The closing date for
applications is 31 August 2003, and the award will
be presented on 15 November during the EMBL/EMBO
joint conference on Science & Society in
Heidelberg.
More information at:
www.embo.org/projects/scisoc/com_medal.html
AGENDA
A number of interesting
conferences and workshops is coming up. Of all the
events mentioned here, the detailed programmes and
registration/application forms are available from
the ACTIP secretariat.
11th European
Congress on Biotechnology, 25th anniversary of
EFB:
Building bridges between biosciences and
bioengineering
24-29 August, 2003, Basel, Switzerland
Organisation: ECB11, Tel + 41 61 686 28 28; fax:
+41 61 686 21 85;
email: info@ecb11.ch
; web: http://www.ecb11.ch
EuroScience
Open Forum 2004 (ESOF2004)
August 25 - 28 August
2004, Stockholm
Information: www.esof2004.org
6th
Conference on
Protein
Expression in Animal Cells
September 7-11, 2003, Montreal, Canada
Information: Amine Kamen, Biotechnology Research
Institute, tel + 514 496 0915, fax + 514 496
6785
Email: 6thPEACe@nrc.ca
; www.bri.nrc.ca/6thPEACe
Strategic
Resource management
September 18-19, 2003 Philadelphia, PA, USA
Information: www.PharmaSeries.com
3rd meeting
of the European Life Sciences Organization
ELSO 2003
September 20-24, Dresden,
Germany
Information: www.elso.org/index.php?id-elso2003
Biotech
Nantes 2003:
7th European Biotech Crossroads
Sept 25, Nantes, France
Information: www.biotech-nantes.com
Health and
Wealth, economic and social dimensions of
health
Oct 1-4, Bad Gastein, Salzburg, Austria
Information: www.ehfg.org
BioTechnica
Hannover, 2003
Oct 7, 2003, Hannover, germany
Information: www.mess.de
The
pharmaceutical discovery
congress
October 7-10, Boston, MA, USA
Information: www.GenomicsOnTarget.com
Following
chemical genomics diversity-oriented
synthesis
October 9-10, 2003, Harvard University, USA
Information: www.GenomicsOnTarget.com
RNAi in
target validation
October 9-10, 2003, Boston MA, USA
Information: www.GenomicsOnTarget.com
BioPartnering
Europe
October 12-14, London UK
BioValley
Life Sciences Week
October 13-17, 2003, Basel, Switzerland
Information: info@biovalleybasel.com
Epidos Annual
Conference
Patinnova '03
November 10-12, 2003, Luxembourg
Information: HYPERLINK "http://www.patinnova.org"
www.patinnova.org
Or www.european-patent-office.org/epidos/conf/eac2003/
11th Annual
Meeting of the European Society of Gene
Therapy
Nov 14-17, 2003, Edinburgh UK
Information: + 46 8459 6600
Advances in
Cell Culture Processing
Nov 16-21, 2003, San Francisco, USA
Information: American Institute of Chemical
Engineers, tel + 1 212 591 7338
CORDIA-EuropaBio
Convention 2003
Dec 2-4, 2003, Vienna, Austria
Information: clare.king@reedexpo.co.uk
www.cordiaconvention.com
BioSquare
2004
March 10-12, 2004, Basel, Switzerland
Information: mailto:info@biovalleybasel.com
ACTIP
bulletin no. 35, August 2003
|